We have waited long before you comment on the recent meetings between union representatives and Delegation treating, but now we need to use it. Yes, because after we read what a few - we believe - end wag wrote in the wheel of a Meeting of the staff, we can no longer remain silent.
positive results .... But where? But when?
Commitments?! Challenging?!
But we're kidding?
The delegation was treating the shooting fox: the positive comments that we expressed them struck down at once. We have had confirmation of scientific, laboratory: that of the fox is a feature that grows in the DNA as soon as you get to join the delegation.
We have literally (to use a polite euphemism) carried through the ... nose during nearly four months, we could not even have reliable figures on which to argue. The Secretary-General
sipped telling them he wanted to "share" the data ( sic ).
Excuse me doctor, what does it mean to "share" numerical data?
For each request: silence and stares into space. Massu!
Then, suddenly, Dec. 9 (after having taken in "waiting room" for almost two hours) came with thick sheets and sheets of numbers.
it happens, after half an hour of discussion and winks between the delegation and some colleagues, CGIL, CISL and agreed on everything. Only after the grievances of UIL and autonomous, it was decided to convene the Assembly staff.
understand why it is called the Assembly and the staff will be able to tell her?
However, being now the end of the year we Fenal / Diccap we approved the establishment of the fund, however, with the following statement on the record that was made together with Giancarlo Pozzi DBB / USB that did not support the second point of the first asterisk.
This is the statement in the minutes:
In approving the allocation of the fund in 2010, the undersigned, representing the Fenal Roberto Piccinini, and Giancarlo Pozzi DICCAP representing the RDB / USB-Alexandria with this statement: *
to to ensure the progression of economic sectors to all those eligible, offer:
- increase of €. 20,000.00 fund for the PEO 2010;
- to identify a form of compensation for employees with comprehensive
secretarial tasks of management;
- to recognize the application of Article 2009 the staff identified therein. 4, paragraph 2
(personnel performing work outside the home (control treatment plants, landfills, wells, land reclamation, quarrying,
IPPC, EIA, waste, air emissions, paths);
* expressing serious doubts as to the distribution of " background art. 17 Negotiable Negotiable 1/4/1999 and 22/1/2004 for the year 2010 ".
In fact, this distribution is easy to detect the huge contradiction between the destinations
- .= of 675,000 € uro for the "fund position and pay little result" for the 58 employees in charge of organizational position, then on average: € 11,637 .= (gross) each;
- .= 557,609.81 € uro and the "productivity incentive fund and improvement of services", for the remaining employees: No 667-58 (po) = 609, then on average: hordes € 915.61) each.
presence of so large a bit on one side distorts the original feature of this figure is on the other contract is unjustifiable in view of the structure Entity (you can see that there are 68 out of 677 employees and some leaders, namely: 1 executive figure or treated every 10 employees, about ) and the fact that there are employees who have the position of some years and years and there are employees who are "somewhat personal, since, while you drag the title transferred from the old to the new office.
In fact, then, that of "organizational positions" category has become a stable salary brackets, so that, as there are four bands with slightly different remuneration of between 8,000 and € 12,500, there is often a bit in transit range to another (always in progress and ever declining).
It is, therefore, to pay a fee so stable - as has been said and repeated - of a real category in which salary brackets has organized a real economic progress.
All this happens without any control or transparency, the same acts in office, too many times, exceed - to say the least - in generic and related investigations, though requested by labor unions, have been declared by the company's counterparty inaccessible containing - according to the same counterparty business - data protected by privacy.
In addition, as shown in the information page on the No 2 of the financial statements of 2009 and 2008 published on the website of the (following the path "transparency, evaluation and merit" / "decentralized bargaining), the organization that formally declares that the "organizational positions" are assigned through an "announcement and a subsequent selection procedure" which does not correspond to reality in any way. Because of that, therefore, serious reservations about the legality of this area of \u200b\u200bpersonnel management, have wondered for some time publicly clarification on this matter, but there has been no response.
Finally, it should be noted that - while acknowledging that many employees enjoy other benefits identified in the "background" such as grants, PEO, specific responsibilities, etc.. - This situation creates a serious inequality between employees as a whole, in fact, the so-called "administrative staff" penalized is totally not having any emolument attachment other than those in "productivity incentive fund and improvement of services" and "specific responsibilities". Other
speech deserve the so-called "projects", repeating "verbatim" every year and that many times in fact relate to the activities can be configured as a mere institutional activity.
The undersigned request that this statement is transcribed in all the acts in which you 'mention of the approval of the Fund.
We "share" with "those responsible" response to the request in paragraph beginning "In this to be added ... "and ends with the words" ... there has been no response.
The delegation was treating the shooting fox: the positive comments that we expressed them struck down at once. We have had confirmation of scientific, laboratory: that of the fox is a feature that grows in the DNA as soon as you get to join the delegation.
We have literally (to use a polite euphemism) carried through the ... nose during nearly four months, we could not even have reliable figures on which to argue. The Secretary-General
sipped telling them he wanted to "share" the data ( sic ).
Excuse me doctor, what does it mean to "share" numerical data?
For each request: silence and stares into space. Massu!
Then, suddenly, Dec. 9 (after having taken in "waiting room" for almost two hours) came with thick sheets and sheets of numbers.
it happens, after half an hour of discussion and winks between the delegation and some colleagues, CGIL, CISL and agreed on everything. Only after the grievances of UIL and autonomous, it was decided to convene the Assembly staff.
understand why it is called the Assembly and the staff will be able to tell her?
However, being now the end of the year we Fenal / Diccap we approved the establishment of the fund, however, with the following statement on the record that was made together with Giancarlo Pozzi DBB / USB that did not support the second point of the first asterisk.
This is the statement in the minutes:
In approving the allocation of the fund in 2010, the undersigned, representing the Fenal Roberto Piccinini, and Giancarlo Pozzi DICCAP representing the RDB / USB-Alexandria with this statement: *
to to ensure the progression of economic sectors to all those eligible, offer:
- increase of €. 20,000.00 fund for the PEO 2010;
- to identify a form of compensation for employees with comprehensive
secretarial tasks of management;
- to recognize the application of Article 2009 the staff identified therein. 4, paragraph 2
(personnel performing work outside the home (control treatment plants, landfills, wells, land reclamation, quarrying,
IPPC, EIA, waste, air emissions, paths);
* expressing serious doubts as to the distribution of " background art. 17 Negotiable Negotiable 1/4/1999 and 22/1/2004 for the year 2010 ".
In fact, this distribution is easy to detect the huge contradiction between the destinations
- .= of 675,000 € uro for the "fund position and pay little result" for the 58 employees in charge of organizational position, then on average: € 11,637 .= (gross) each;
- .= 557,609.81 € uro and the "productivity incentive fund and improvement of services", for the remaining employees: No 667-58 (po) = 609, then on average: hordes € 915.61) each.
presence of so large a bit on one side distorts the original feature of this figure is on the other contract is unjustifiable in view of the structure Entity (you can see that there are 68 out of 677 employees and some leaders, namely: 1 executive figure or treated every 10 employees, about ) and the fact that there are employees who have the position of some years and years and there are employees who are "somewhat personal, since, while you drag the title transferred from the old to the new office.
In fact, then, that of "organizational positions" category has become a stable salary brackets, so that, as there are four bands with slightly different remuneration of between 8,000 and € 12,500, there is often a bit in transit range to another (always in progress and ever declining).
It is, therefore, to pay a fee so stable - as has been said and repeated - of a real category in which salary brackets has organized a real economic progress.
All this happens without any control or transparency, the same acts in office, too many times, exceed - to say the least - in generic and related investigations, though requested by labor unions, have been declared by the company's counterparty inaccessible containing - according to the same counterparty business - data protected by privacy.
In addition, as shown in the information page on the No 2 of the financial statements of 2009 and 2008 published on the website of the (following the path "transparency, evaluation and merit" / "decentralized bargaining), the organization that formally declares that the "organizational positions" are assigned through an "announcement and a subsequent selection procedure" which does not correspond to reality in any way. Because of that, therefore, serious reservations about the legality of this area of \u200b\u200bpersonnel management, have wondered for some time publicly clarification on this matter, but there has been no response.
Finally, it should be noted that - while acknowledging that many employees enjoy other benefits identified in the "background" such as grants, PEO, specific responsibilities, etc.. - This situation creates a serious inequality between employees as a whole, in fact, the so-called "administrative staff" penalized is totally not having any emolument attachment other than those in "productivity incentive fund and improvement of services" and "specific responsibilities". Other
speech deserve the so-called "projects", repeating "verbatim" every year and that many times in fact relate to the activities can be configured as a mere institutional activity.
The undersigned request that this statement is transcribed in all the acts in which you 'mention of the approval of the Fund.
We "share" with "those responsible" response to the request in paragraph beginning "In this to be added ... "and ends with the words" ... there has been no response.
picture: Christmas decorations (beads cluster).
The Ghilini offers a breakfast for those (especially in the Val d' U ziu Dundo'na ) is able to state precisely and in great way the relationship between the drawing and the convening of the wheel ' Assembly.
Send us your "interpretations", the publications: anonymous, of course.
0 comments:
Post a Comment