school reform and conservative left
I would not have intervened in the debate these days about the school, if I had not heard a mountain of hot air, made up of bad sociology, bad education, bad publicity and bad policy, a mountain of topics that the center just an idea: "Nothing should be changed, because the school, as it is, is the school that we built and we have to defend as such."
OECD DATA
• WE ARE 17% OF GRADUATES BETWEEN 25 AND 33 YEARS AGAINST THE 33% OF MOST COUNTRIES INDUSTRIALIZED (U.S. UNDER A CHILE AND MEXICO)
• OUR GRADUATES ARE 15% LESS OF GREECE AND 5% LESS OF SLOVENIA
• OUR YOUNG PEOPLE BETWEEN 15 AND 16 YEARS HAVE THE LOWEST LEVEL OF TRAINING OF ALL EUROPE in science and language
to measure what it is, we must speak of these tests explaining them.
• 60% OF STUDENTS ignored because SUCCESSIVE DAY AND NIGHT (the Earth rotates on its axis)
• 30% OF THE STUDENTS OF THE HIGH SCHOOL and difficulties in solving this problem: the exchange rate between the dollar Singapore and South Africa's rand is 1 to 4.2, how many rand worth $ 3,000 in Singapore?
And this is the school that we want and we have to defend? This school is the basis of loss of competition in our country. We want to go on like this?
What should our school? It should be good citizens. Should provide opportunities for social success at all, to his son as the son of the professional worker, ensuring equal opportunities as they create the social mobility that is at the heart of a democratic society and should be even more important to the left. Instead the school in Italy today reinforces social differences for the son of a professional lawyer or doctor, will be able to afford better education, while the others must make do with what little they gave him the school. Indeed, Italy is among the Western countries that has the lowest social mobility, and that more consolidation differences also depart in the next path of the young.
What is the problem today? The school should put the center's students and teachers as it happens, because as hospitals put at the center of the sick and their health, the school must put the student at the center and its training.
The school, however, for the gentlemen of the Left, is primarily the work of teachers. The left, which is trade union left, even before the political left, which still has never reformist defends them with a social block of reference and a cultural blockade that has been created over the years.
with these brilliant ideas that have been abandoned by the left, the university has become a high school, and not the best, high school became a middle school, and not the best, the school became an elementary school, and not the best. So we have the results of the OECD, the ones I mentioned earlier.
But what does the Democratic Party? He says that this is due to the fact that in Italian schools spend less and this government intends to cut. I've got some notes that OECD might be interesting to examine.
spending 3% of GDP (such as Germany, POCO LESS THAN GREAT BRITAIN AND FRANCE) THE AVERAGE OF 25 most industrialized countries is OECD
HOWEVER SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENT TO KNOW THAT THE STATE IS ON EACH STUDENT: OECD 5710 EURO 4623 EURO MEDIA MEDIA ITALY (1000 EURO MORE GERMANY AND GREAT BRITAIN AND FRANCE 500 euros more
continue with some numbers:
THE BUDGET OF THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND
42.5 BILLION IN 1999 WAS 32 BILLION SPENDING
CRESCIUTADEL is SO 30% BUT FAILED TO SEE IMPROVEMENTS rather grew worse OUR STANDARD IN ALL INTERNATIONAL ASSESSMENTS
The Prodi government in the Technical Commission for public spending, the report Commission's so-called Muraro, established at the initiative of the Minister Tommaso Padoa Schioppa, said that the expenditure per student in Italy is among the major OECD and the relationship between teachers and students is much higher than elsewhere, yet the results measured in the test learning used internationally, are modest. This is the reality of the Italian school.
is not true that the school budget cuts will suffer for 8 billion: the cut next year will be below 0.5 billion (1% of budget), the cuts planned for the period 2009-2011 amounted to 3.6 billion spread over three years.
is not true that 87 000 teachers will be fired: the reduction in the number of teaching posts will be limiting the creation of jobs, the figure of 87 000 teachers will be reached in less than in 2012 and included in the calculation of the reductions already planned by Prodi (about 20 000 units in its time, considered too in the White paper published on the school just over a year ago by the previous government). Carry a few in this regard since:
30,000 EURO: The average salary of a teacher ITALIAN
38,000 EURO: THE AVERAGE SALARY OF A TEACHER IN OECD COUNTRIES
50,000 EURO: THE AVERAGE SALARY OF A TEACHER IN GERMANY This is
because we have:
1 teacher for every nine pupils in ITALY
1 teacher for every 12 pupils in Europe with TIPS FOR STUDENTS 14 OR 16
735 HOURS FOR A TEACHER IN ITALY AGAINST 812 OECD
97% of the budget of the Ministry is for 81% AGAINST SALARY
OECD COUNTRIES TO INVEST IN THE SCHOOL WE 3 % while the others have 20%
But let's get to the point that was chosen as an ideological banner of the opposition Democratic Party: that only the teacher who actually prefer to call prevalent.
The teacher must be the dominant figure as a mother is accompanying the growth of the personality of the child at the age of 5, 6 years to reach elementary school, not like the 3 or 4 teachers who instead only create confusion. In fact looking
Eurydice is the database on education systems in Europe is made an interesting discovery: no country provides primary school teachers that the plurality of modular organization exists in Italy
However there will be prevalent next to the master teachers of English, physical education and support!
The left wanted to believe that Italy, want to abolish the whole time. The full-time with this measure will be increased by 50% simply because the prevailing free master teachers who then will be available for two goals: full-time appointments and evening courses in Italian for foreign children. In fact, another major goal of reform is to foster integration, knowledge language, customs and traditions of our country
I would have expected from the Democratic Party of words such as: "To have a better Italy we need a better school, and the conditions of our school system require courageous decisions of renewal and are not sustainable positions in defense of the pure, Italy must reduce its deficit to zero and nothing can reduce this social and political imperative, and this also entails a cost containment of the school. " This I would have expected from the leader of the Democratic Party who wanted to be reformist. Thank God these words came from the Head of State, which has honored its history of reforms and the Republic, while in the streets pay homage the only bad demagoguery and bad policy that destroyed the country.
0 comments:
Post a Comment